The program includes the ability to enter a single team or track as many teamsopponents as desired.
Call Of Duty 4 Stat Tracker 1.0 Purchase Archive Of PastA new database is created for each season recording that seasons stats and providing an archive of past seasons.Program features include: Ideal for High School, College, Semi-Pro, ManagersStatisticians Perfect for tracking the stats of your favorite baseball team Extremely useful for fantasy baseball enthusiasts Store individual data for players and coaches Enter as much or as little info about the other teams you play as you wish Track hitting, fielding, and pitching stats View, print and export reports of all stats Stores inning-by-inning data for all games played.
Additionally, the 13-inch 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro was 45.5 percent faster after the update. Apples switch to Intel processors and the Macs growing market share has helped lure more game developers. But despite the gains, Apple is still playing catch-up with Windows and game consoles. Now is a good time to explore the graphics performance differences between Mac and Windows, with so many games now common across both platforms. To test for graphics performance, we used Boot Camp to create a dual-boot Mac. For the Mac, we ran Mac OS 10.6.4 with the Snow Leopard Graphics Update. We tested on four different Mac systems: a 27-inch 2.66GHz Core i5 iMac, a 2.66GHz Xeon quad-core Mac Pro, a 13-inch 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro, and a 15-inch 2.53GHz Core i5 MacBook Pro. With some help from Valve, we created a demo in Portal ( ) that would appropriately tax each Macs graphics subsystem. In an early level of Portal, we did everything from jumping through a endless portal tunnel to getting shot by half a dozen military robots, being careful to manipulate and interact with as many objects as possible. We also ran a framerate demo of Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare ( ), as well as Cinebench R11.5s OpenGL test (both of which are components of our Speedmark 6.5 benchmark suite). One problem we encountered during testing was screen resolutionor rather, the inability to make the 27-inch iMac run a test at 2560 by 1440 pixels. While the iMac display has a native resolution of 2560-by-1440, both Call of Duty 4 and Portal would revert to lower resolutions and not allow the user to run at 2560-by-1440. Luckily, we were able to use an Apple 27-inch LED Cinema Display connected to the iMac to trick the computer into running a higher resolution. After mirroring the Cinema Display, we disconnected it and we were able to run the games at 2560-by-1440. After we collected the results, we then compared the best results between the Mac and Windows. ![]() At 1024-by-768, the difference was similarly large, about 37 percent faster in Boot Camp. Our 2.66GHz Xeon quad-core Mac Pro results also showed faster Windows scores in Portal, with a difference of 20 percent at 1024-by-768, 24 percent at 1920-by-1200, and 25 percent at 2560-by-1440. Call Of Duty 4 Stat Tracker 1.0 Purchase Mac OS X In TheThe 15-inch 2.53GHz Core i5 MacBook Pros test followed suit, with Windows 7 beating Mac OS X in the Portal demo with a 13 percent frames-per-second (FPS) gap at 1024-by-768, 24 percent at 1920-by-1200, and 21 percent at 2560-by-1440. Windows 7s faster scores were less pronounced with the 27-inch 2.66GHz Core i5 iMac (most likely due to the 256MB ATI Radeon HD 4670 graphics card), but there was still a notable difference. Once again, the Windows framerates in Portal were faster than Mac OS X with a difference of 10 percent at 1024-by-768, 12 percent at 1920-by-1200, and 17 percent at 2560-by-1440 pixels. In the end, Windows 7 bested Mac OS X on almost every test, with the only exceptions being slightly higher scores in the 2.66GHz Core i5 iMacs Call of Duty 4 results, which were 2 to 3 percent faster than the same system running Windows 7. Call Of Duty 4 Stat Tracker 1.0 Purchase Drivers From AWe also fully updated Windows 7 with Boot Camp drivers from a retail copy of Snow Leopard, along with other miscellaneous system additions. Using Steam and Steam for Mac, we created a self-running demo for Portal and recorded the frames-per-second rating. The results couldve been much worse on the Mac OS X side if not for the dramatic improvements made by the Snow Leopard graphics update released in August. We tested each Mac with and without the graphics update, and the biggest performance increase occurred with the 2.66GHz Xeon quad-core Mac Pro, with a 55 percent jump in FPS in our Portal demo.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |